• Sir_Fridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So using the Dunning-Krueger effect to prove how smart you are is an example of the Dunning-Krueger effect?

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well it depends on how you’re using it.

        On the surface, if I understand what you’re asking correctly, no. From what I’m understanding of these articles, the dunning Krueger effect never did what it set out to accomplish, but something along the lines of people who don’t know much have a much larger amount of things that they themselves aren’t even aware of not knowing… if that makes sense? I can try to reword later tonight after I finish with work

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your last link pissed me off enough I wrote an entire post on why that study is dog shit.

      It sometimes pays off to review the methodology and supplementary materials in papers.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This disptoves any statistical anonmaly that suggests the majority of people fall into the “dunninng-kruger effect”; it doesn’t disprove the existence of ignorant people who overestimate their understanding or knowledgeable people who understimate their understanding.

      Thus OP’s question becomes: how do you know if you’re one of those people?