• fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    no thanks. i hate the entire concept of insurance (especially lawfully forced insurance). there’s no way i want them spying on me.

    there are parts of the west where there’s not another car for miles. why should i be punished for minor infractions on a lonely country road when i put no one but myself at risk? this is the same as getting ticketed by a camera for running a red light in the middle of nowhere.

    if the law and technology becomes a tool of oppression, it no longer serves a useful purpose for mankind.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Basic traffic liability insurance sorta makes sense - it’d suck you had your car wrecked by someone broke and were SOL.

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        i think that if i am going to be forced to purchase a product from the market, then the government should just provide the product. add the damages to my tax bill if i get in an accident that’s my fault.

        but don’t make me buy shit just to function in society.

        it’s a scam. the money you pay in is always more than they pay out. it’s a for profit industry that i’m forced to fund. it’s a racket, no different from organized crime.