• howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Gotta ignore infinities too. The axioms they’re based on are highly controversial.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        And irrational numbers. I mean the numbers make sense, but it’s not like we can intuitively understand sqrt(-1).

        • kryptonite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re thinking of imaginary numbers. Irrational numbers are real numbers that have an infinite number of decimal places and don’t repeat.

    • reinei@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah even statistics is perfectly logical and right, but not because truth is absolute (there may be such a thing, but we definitely don’t have access to it in that case. [At this time?]), but rather because math defined there to be a way in which all you derive from it is ‘absolutely’ true. It just might be ‘absolutely’ true in a system that isn’t ours, or isn’t useful for answering anything we want to ask…