SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months ago"I would never bully someone for being autistic!"fedia.ioimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1image"I would never bully someone for being autistic!"fedia.ioSuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoIf we’re going here… Whitelist isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Use terms like allow-list or permit-list.
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoSo now what do we call the opposite list?
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-25 months agoUsually a deny-list or a block-list. These are the inclusive terms that are getting adopted in IT, at least, and they usually work in that context. Maybe not for everything.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-25 months agoSo what the heck are we calling “Grey-hats” now? Edit: not to mention the other two hat terms
minus-squarequaternaut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-25 months agoAt my company, white hat hackers are to be called “offensive security researchers”. Black hat hackers are to be called “attackers”.
If we’re going here…
Whitelist isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Use terms like allow-list or permit-list.
So now what do we call the opposite list?
Usually a deny-list or a block-list.
These are the inclusive terms that are getting adopted in IT, at least, and they usually work in that context. Maybe not for everything.
So what the heck are we calling “Grey-hats” now?
Edit: not to mention the other two hat terms
At my company, white hat hackers are to be called “offensive security researchers”. Black hat hackers are to be called “attackers”.