I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don’t, you weren’t paying attention.

Plenty of us were critiquing Clinton’s campaign on those merits and were consistently talked down to in shocker the same way we’re being talked down to now. Shocker, she lost. I remember saying a few weeks before the election “We’re about to get Brexited.” I put my down for Clinton, because Trump is fucking insane, and that was clear before he was President. It was clear in the fucking 1980’s.

Being able to critique our leaders is supposed to be what is the difference between us and conservative voters. They’re the cult who unquestioningly believes all the bullshit that comes out of Trump’s mouth and diapers. I find it weird that people think we should be more like them in regards to our leaders like that would be a good thing.

  • MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. There is.

    Holy crap, are people only realizing this now? This is endtimes stuff. Fall-of-the-Roman-Empire stuff. This is the period people will read about in history books about when the era of the last Cold War superpower ended and the post-liberal democracy era started.

    This ends when the US passes a new Constitution. If you’re very, very lucky there won’t be a massive violent conflict, a full-on dictatorship or a Mad Max-style postapocalypse to go through first.

    It’s the boiling frog that I can’t get over. The fact that people are still talking like this is an election cycle. It’s not. You can’t have an election cycle with just one candidate when the other guy is actively running for supreme fascist ruler. There is no working democracy in the US, and given the state of the GOP there won’t be one again until the US gives itself some form of multiparty parliamentarism, or at least a heavily reformed electoral system.

    If the conversation is not in these terms… well, see my “worry and fear” comment above.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think I’m further along than you are, because I remember being terrified like that. Now I’m resigned to it, and planning for a time when I might have to feed myself and help around my community. And reading a lot of history to help with the idea of falling empires being a bad thing.

      Still vote. It’s better than the alternative. But this is the end times and things are changing faster than our government is capable of dealing with.

      Fucking “interesting times.”

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Okay, but it’s not the fall that’s a problem. Empires end all the time.

        It’s what comes in between the fall and the next thing.

        Because it can be a consensus that things need to change and a rational breakdown of how. That’s more or less how it went last time for the US. That happens. That’s an option.

        Or it can be a big messy fight, which is more or less how that went immediately after that for the US.

        Or it can be total domination from the fascists, at which point it’s no longer a US problem and one starts wondering if there is a “next thing” at all.

        I’m sorry to be the bearer of even more bad news, but hitting rock bottom is a lot of work. You don’t get to relax and enjoy the ride, I’m afraid.

          • MudMan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh, you can. For decades. Because if you don’t, a time will come when you don’t get a choice at all, and that can last for decades, too.

            And no, I won’t get over it. The more disinterest and lack of urgency I see from people the less I get over it, in fact.

            I think there’s a lack of remembered trauma, perhaps. It certainly doesn’t sink in to many Americans. That’s why the Germans immediately went out to protest, but the American frog is calmly simmering. You do you, but I find it irresponsible to keep everybody else in the splash zone.

            In any case, I think the question has been answered.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s why the Germans immediately went out to protest, but the American frog is calmly simmering.

              It couldn’t be something like Americans were involved in literally the largest worldwide protests ever leading up to the Iraq War and it did nothing to stop the war. It couldn’t be that Occupy Wall Street being ushered out of the park by armed police had nothing to do with it either.

              Just get out and protest guys! Don’t forget you can’t leave the Free Speech Zone!

              Remember George Floyd, well all our protests resulted in *checks notes… The largest police budgets in the history of the US!

              Give me a break.

              • MudMan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, this may come as a shock, but the “largest worldwide protests ever” also happened in Germany.

                So no, it literally couldn’t be that.

                I’m not here to advocate that protesting fixes all problems. I will, however, advocate that if you think protesting doesn’t fix anything, protesting on social media DEFINITELY doesn’t.

                It can demotivate people politically aligned with you enough to cost you an election, though, so there’s that.

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Why is the blame on me for talking about Democratic failures demotivating people and not… Democratic failures demotivating people?

                  Like, the actual action of their failure won’t demotivate people? Just people talking about it? How does that work?

                  • MudMan@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Because motivation shouldn’t even be part of the conversation at all.

                    Again, end times. Fall of the empire. Looming fascism. Non-functioning democracy.

                    Because when you speak in a political campaign you’re campaigning. You can do two things and you’ll get no grief from me: campaign for fascists not to be in power or shut up.

                    The people campaigning against the people campaigning against fascists are the fascists.

                    You are in a restaurant that is on fire complaining that they mixed up your order. It’s infuriating and extremely your fault.